Bring Chicago Home
Bring Chicago Home: Restructuring Transfer Tax to Combat Homelessness
The Bring Chicago Home (BCH) initiative proposed restructuring Chicago's real estate transfer tax to create a dedicated funding stream for homelessness relief. The plan would replace the city's flat 0.75% transfer tax with a graduated structure that would decrease rates for properties under $1 million while substantially increasing rates for higher-value sales.
{% if request.current_user.is_member? %}:
SPLITWho Proposed It: Originally conceived by grassroots advocates with lived experience of homelessness in 2017, formalized by a coalition of community organizations, service providers, and unions in 2018. Alderwoman Maria Hadden (49), Matt Martin (47), and Carlos Ramirez-Rosa (35) officially introduced the resolution in September 2023.
What It Does: Replaces Chicago's flat 0.75% real estate transfer tax with a graduated structure: 0.6% on portions under $1 million (a 20% decrease), 2.0% on portions between $1-1.5 million, and 3.0% on portions above $1.5 million. Revenue from the increase would be legally dedicated to homelessness initiatives.
Who It Affects: Approximately 96% of property sales in Chicago (those under $1 million) would see a tax reduction. The 4% of sales over $1 million would bear increased rates, with commercial properties shouldering a greater share of the tax burden.
What's at Stake: An estimated $100 million in new annual revenue to address Chicago's homelessness crisis, which affects approximately 76,000 residents. The funds would support permanent housing solutions, rental assistance, and wraparound services.
Current Status: Defeated in a binding referendum on March 19, 2024, with 47.7% voting yes and 52.3% voting no.
Key Supporters: Mayor Brandon Johnson, Progressive Caucus members of City Council, Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, Chicago Teachers Union, SEIU Healthcare Illinois/Indiana, and numerous advocacy and faith organizations.
Key Opponents: Chicago Association of REALTORS, Building Owners and Managers Association, Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, Neighborhood Building Owners Alliance, and Chicagoland Apartment Association.
Origins and Political Path
The Bring Chicago Home concept emerged in 2017 when individuals with lived experience of homelessness developed the proposal for a dedicated homelessness funding stream. A formal coalition formed in 2018 to advance this plan.
The initiative faced political resistance in its early stages. In 2019, despite majority Council support, a referendum was blocked under pressure from Finance Committee Chair Patrick O'Connor, a close ally of then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Lori Lightfoot promised to support BCH during her 2019 mayoral campaign but once in office dismissed it as "never going to happen" due to fiscal constraints.
The political landscape changed when Mayor Brandon Johnson took office in 2023. In September 2023, Aldermen Hadden, Martin, and Ramirez-Rosa introduced a new resolution. On November 7, 2023, the City Council passed it by a 32-17 vote, placing a binding referendum on the March 19, 2024 ballot.
Policy Mechanics and Revenue Allocation
Chicago's real estate transfer tax was a flat 0.75% of the sale price (plus 0.3% for CTA). The BCH proposal would have replaced this with a graduated structure:
- 0.60% on portions under $1,000,000 (a 20% decrease)
- 2.0% on portions between $1,000,000 and $1,500,000 (a 166% increase)
- 3.0% on portions above $1,500,000 (a 300% increase)
These rates would apply on a marginal basis—meaning only the value in each bracket would be taxed at the higher rates.
Proponents projected approximately $100 million in new annual revenue, legally dedicated to a special purpose fund for homelessness relief. The Chicago Coalition for the Homeless emphasized that "the funding generated from Bring Chicago Home would never have gone to shelter beds or balancing the city budget; these funds were set to go specifically to fund long-term solutions through permanent housing and wraparound services."
The funds would have supported three programs temporarily funded by federal COVID relief: Rapid Re-Housing, Homeless outreach & mental health services, and Emergency rental assistance for at-risk tenants.
A 15-member advisory board composed of community members, service providers, and people with lived homelessness experience would oversee the homeless fund, appointed by the mayor with City Council approval.
The Scope of Chicago's Homelessness Crisis
Chicago faces a severe homelessness crisis. The January 2024 point-in-time count tallied 18,836 people experiencing homelessness in shelters or on streets—a dramatic increase from 6,139 in 2023 and 3,875 in 2022, largely due to an influx of asylum-seekers.
When accounting for all forms of homelessness, including "doubled-up" individuals staying temporarily with others, the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless estimates approximately 76,000 Chicagoans experienced homelessness in 2022.
The crisis disproportionately impacts people of color. More than half of homeless Chicagoans are Black, and over 80% are people of color. Families represent a significant segment—over 17,000 Chicago Public Schools students lack permanent housing.
As of 2023, Chicago's shelter system was severely strained, with approximately 3,000 traditional shelter beds plus emergency shelters for migrants. Mayor Johnson's 2025 budget proposed increasing total capacity to 6,800 beds, but an estimated 4,000+ person gap would remain between available beds and those needing shelter.
Political Battle Lines
BCH was backed by a progressive coalition led by Mayor Johnson, who stated that voters gave him a mandate to address homelessness and "right the wrong" that 1 in 4 Black children in Chicago lack stable housing. Lead Council supporters included Alderpeople Hadden, Ramirez-Rosa, and Martin.
Dozens of advocacy organizations supported BCH, with the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless spearheading the campaign. The Chicago Teachers Union contributed $400,000 to the pro-BCH committee, with additional support from SEIU Healthcare Illinois/Indiana.
Opposition was led by real estate and business groups arguing the tax would hurt Chicago's economy. The Chicago Association of REALTORS and Building Owners and Managers Association funded a "No" campaign. The "Keep Chicago Affordable" PAC received $800,000 from Chicago Forward (originally formed to support Rahm Emanuel). The Illinois REALTORS Association contributed $654,000, and the National Association of REALTORS provided $850,000.
Several conservative Council members opposed the referendum, including Ald. Raymond Lopez (15th), who argued the city should spend existing homeless funds before "asking for more."
Legal Challenges
Real estate groups sued to stop the referendum in January 2024, arguing the ballot question was invalid for being "vague and ambiguous" and improperly bundling multiple tax changes in violation of the state constitution.
On February 17, 2024, Judge Kathleen Pantle Burke ruled the referendum question unconstitutional, effectively ordering that votes not be counted. The City appealed, and in early March 2024, the Illinois First District Appellate Court reversed the lower court on procedural grounds, allowing the election to proceed with votes being tallied.
Referendum Results and Voting Patterns
Chicago voters defeated the Bring Chicago Home referendum on March 19, 2024, with 47.7% voting Yes and 52.3% voting No. Approximately 213,000 voted in favor and 234,000 against out of roughly 447,000 ballots cast.
Voter turnout was low—about 20% of registered voters participated, attributed to an uncompetitive presidential primary. The geographic breakdown revealed clear patterns: homeowner-dominated precincts voted approximately 62% No, while majority-renter precincts voted 55% Yes on average.
Some precincts on the far Southwest Side (19th Ward) voted over 90% against BCH, while Far North Side areas like Rogers Park (49th Ward) saw up to 80% support. The referendum's binding nature means the City cannot implement the tax increase without another referendum.
Economic Impact Considerations
Supporters emphasized that 96% of property sales in Chicago would have received a tax cut under BCH, with only the 4% of sales over $1 million facing increases. The plan would shift more tax burden to commercial real estate, increasing their share from 20% to 36% of total transfer taxes.
Opponents warned that high-end property owners might avoid the market, leading to fewer sales and less investment. They pointed to Los Angeles, where a similar "mansion tax" generated far less revenue than projected due to a sharp decline in high-end sales.
The Civic Federation noted Chicago's transfer tax revenue is "extremely volatile," dropping 30% from 2022 to 2023 as real estate cooled. However, their analysis found that if BCH rates had been in place from 2010-2023, the City would have averaged $117-$128 million more annually than it actually collected.
Campaign Messaging
The Yes campaign framed BCH as a moral and practical solution to homelessness, emphasizing that only wealthy individuals and corporations would pay more. The No campaign characterized BCH as a "property tax hike" that could "raise rents" and "drive businesses out," broadening opposition beyond just high-end property owners.
Despite defeat, supporters remained committed to addressing homelessness. "We are nowhere near the end of our journey," organizers declared, vowing to continue fighting for housing justice. CTU President Stacy Davis Gates stated, "we will continue to advocate... whether it be through a ballot referendum... or legislative initiatives" until every student and family has a home.
The Bring Chicago Home initiative represented a significant attempt to address homelessness through tax policy. Though it fell short in March 2024 amid economic concerns, it elevated public discourse on homelessness in Chicago and may provide a foundation for future efforts to secure dedicated funding for permanent housing solutions.
{% else %}Join or Login to your TDL member account to access additional information.{% endif %}{% if recipient.has_password? == false %} Click here to activate your account.{% endif %}
This is where you place the content you want to show only to members. {% else %} To access additional content, login to your TDL Chicago, Springfield or Professional account. {% endif %}:
-
MAR 20, 2024
UNLOCKED
Bring Chicago Home supporters gather outside the Illinois Appellate Court on March 1. [Michael McDevitt/The Daily Line]
The future of a proposal to raise Chicago’s real estate transfer tax on property sales over $1 million, decrease it for sales under $1 million and use the new tax revenue to fund services and housing to reduce homelessness did not look promising Tuesday night as favorable votes for the ballot question known as Bring Chicago Home trailed opposition votes.
With 97 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday night, 53.8 percent of voters had voted against the ballot question.
-
MAR 14, 2024
The state Supreme Court squashed an effort by commercial groups to reverse an appellate court decision that kept the Bring Chicago Home referendum on the March ballot. And the mayor announced the latest phase of his administration’s community safety plan.
-
MAR 07, 2024
UNLOCKED
Ald. Maria Hadden, attorney Ed Mullen and Bring Chicago Home advocates gather in front of the Illinois Appellate Court on March 1, 2024. [Michael McDevitt/The Daily Line]
The Illinois Appellate Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court’s ruling to suppress the outcome of the city’s referendum to change the real estate transfer tax structure from a flat rate to a graduated rate, allowing the results of the measure known as Bring Chicago Home to be counted.
The appeals court reversed the previous ruling largely on the grounds that the lawsuit was “premature” and that the referendum is a protected part of the city’s legislative process, since the city must receive voter approval before it is allowed to raise the transfer tax.
“The holding of an election for the purpose of passing a referendum to empower a municipality to adopt an ordinance is a step in the legislative process of the enactment of that ordinance,” the appeals court said in a unanimous judgment and opinion delivered by Judge Raymond Mitchell. “Courts do not, and cannot, interfere with the legislative process.”
-
FEB 28, 2024
The Chicago Board of Elections is asking an appeals court to reverse a lower court ruling to suppress the results of the Bring Chicago Home referendum. And a proposal to raise the mandatory retirement age for cops and firefighters could receive approval by a City Council panel Wednesday.
-
FEB 27, 2024
UNLOCKED
City Hall is pictured in this file photo
Cook County Circuit Court Judge Kathleen Burke did not elaborate on her reasoning for invalidating the Bring Chicago Home referendum in a Friday ruling. In a court order received Monday by the Chicago Board of Elections, the defendant in the lawsuit against the referendum, Burke wrote that she ruled against the legality of the ballot question to raise the transfer tax on high-end property sales “for the reasons stated in open court and on the record.”
The court order confirms that the Bring Chicago Home referendum (R2023-0004166) will remain on the primary election ballot but will not be countable or reportable unless an appeals court reverses the decision. The city filed a notice of appeal on Monday.
-
FEB 23, 2024
UNLOCKED
A file photo of voting booths.
A Cook County judge on Friday sided with real estate and commercial groups that had sued the Chicago Board of Elections to keep the Bring Chicago Home referendum off the March 19 primary election ballot. While voters might still be able to vote on the ballot question, the results could be suppressed if a higher court does not reverse the decision on appeal.
The fight to raise the real estate transfer tax was supported by Mayor Brandon Johnson while he campaigned for office. In a statement Friday evening, the mayor’s office said the city was disappointed, believed in the referendum’s legality and was exploring “every legal option available” to ensure voters remain the final say on the question.
-
FEB 15, 2024
The city’s license committee recommended explicitly exempting shoeshine and shoe repair businesses from the city’s checkout bag tax, and the city is attempting to intervene in a lawsuit to throw the real estate transfer tax increase off the March ballot.
-
FEB 07, 2024
UNLOCKED
Ald. Anthony Beale (9) said he's opposed to the Bring Chicago Home ballot measure because he's worried it could stymie investment in Black communities like those in his ward. [Don Vincent/The Daily Line]
A Far South Side alderperson and a member of the Cook County Board of Review spoke out against the Bring Chicago Home proposal during a virtual meeting hosted by the Neighborhood Building Owners Alliance (NBOA) on Tuesday.
-
JAN 05, 2024
UNLOCKED
A file photo of voting booths.
A coalition of real estate industry groups and other commercial groups filed a lawsuit Friday morning against the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners alleging the city’s Bring Chicago Home ballot question is legally invalid in a few ways.
-
NOV 08, 2023
Ald. Maria Hadden (49) talked to Ald. Mike Rodriguez (22) during Tuesday's City Council Meeting. [Don Vincent/The Daily Line]
Alderpeople approved the Bring Chicago Home proposal to ask voters if they want to hike the real estate transfer tax and use the revenue to curb homelessness and delayed a vote on the proposal to expand paid leave for Chicago workers.
